Quick Tips To Write Better

PencilsWe’re coming to the end of another year, so I thought I’d throw out a couple of quick tips to improve your writing.

I hope that, if you are a writer, 2017 has been a creative and rewarding year. But what if it wasn’t? What if it was a real struggle? How can we minimise this for you in 2018?

I don’t know. I don’t have any real answers, and you just be sceptical of anyone who claims to have tidy and neat solutions. If you follow this blog, you probably already know that I’m not a fan of “rules” for writing, so just see these as suggestions that may or may not work for you. Enjoy!

Write Every Day

Consistency is king when you’re working on a more ambitious writing project. Writing every day, even if it’s not much, can really take you to the next level. You think you don’t have time? Just write a few hundred words. Just a couple of paragraphs. Even one paragraph. Just a sentence! Anything.

Writing just a little bit each day helps put you into a routine, where you’re used to writing each day. It’s almost like a form of Pavlovian conditioning on yourself. Slipping behind on your writing deadlines? Even if they’re self-imposed? Give this a go.

Read Every Day

The best writers are solid readers. You don’t have to be really conscientious. Don’t worry about writing down special passages and making notes about styles and form that you like. You might end up just imitating them in bland and predictable ways. Just absorb other people’s work. The good stuff will stay in your mind subconsciously. And when you start adding this stuff into your own work, you’ll probably find it’ll come out as a more creative variation of the work. As Picasso said, “all artists copy. Great artists steal.”

Don’t Edit As You Write

When you write, just write. I know it’s tempting to tweak as you go, but try and resist that. Getting stuff out of your head and onto the page is hard enough. Don’t make it impossible by trying to do it elegantly the first time around. Even if you do edit as you go, you’ll find that you probably will still go back and edit later anyway, because your first pass at editing wasn’t good enough.

I personally do a little light editing after writing chunks of work. Then the real edit happens after the first draft is done. It makes the whole process faster, and I don’t get bogged down in re-writing something that’s not even properly written yet. Editing as you go makes it even harder to remove things that I’ve written previously, which is something you’ll often need to do.

 

Anyway, these little power-up tips might work for you or they might not. But there’s little harm in trying out something knew. Either way, good luck in your upcoming writing projects!

Advertisements

This Year, Try NaNoWriMo In Secret

Leonid_Pasternak_-_The_Passion_of_creationThis isn’t the first time I’ve written about how I struggle to complete writing projects that I’ve talked to people about. I still don’t really know why I struggle. There’s something about letting others in on the story you’re trying to tell, before you’ve finished telling it, that somehow slows me down. Maybe it’s me adding extra pressure on myself? I don’t know. All I know is, these days, I keep my work to myself until it’s done.

It’s been a long while since I wrote that post about not telling anyone about what you’re working on, but I still get emails about it from people, and I’ve seen it shared on many other sites. It still resonates with people, and, as we’re now in November, I thought this might be a relevant topic for National Novel Writing Month.

Are you taking part this year? Have you tried to do it before, but to no avail? If you’ve struggled during NaNoWriMo in the past, maybe it’s BECAUSE it’s a community-oriented idea?

If this sounds familiar, why not write in secret this time around? Don’t make a big thing of it, just write. Do it for yourself, then see how much further you progress this time around. Has stepping away from the crowd made things easier for you? Let me know!

Regardless of whether this is your first NaNoWriMo, or you’re a seasoned veteran, I wish you the best of luck in your projects. I hope you have a creatively rewarding time.

All the best, Andy.

When Writing a Novel, Not Knowing Everything is Part of the Fun

open roadWhat’s the best holiday you’ve ever been on? Chances are, regardless of what sort of holiday you enjoy the most, it would be one where you didn’t know the full outcome before you went away.

By this I mean you didn’t plan every last little thing before you packed your bags and set sail/took flight. You maybe had a rough idea, but even if you did do a little planning, there were still unexpected moments that made the trip worthwhile. It was more fun that way.

The wise old Greek philosopher Socrates was once recognised as the wisest man alive by the Oracle of Delphi, Pythia. It was probably a good observation. After all, Socrates was, well, Socrates, right? A smart dude.

Socrates responded to this praise: “I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing.”

He wasn’t just being falsely modest. He was stating a fact.

What does Socrates and the best holiday you’ve ever had got to do with your writing? Not knowing everything is smart. It’s a sign of confidence, not weakness.

As a writer, I don’t plan every last thing before wading into my first draft. I let myself go. Discover things as I go along.

I can’t recommend this mindset enough. Let yourself get a little lost every now and them. You can always double-back if you need to.

For me, it’s the not knowing everything that’s the fun part. I do a little planning, but with an emphasis on ‘little’. Just like Socrates, be aware that you don’t know everything. Embrace the unexpected as you go. Your novel-writing adventure will be much more fun for it, and it’ll probably be a better novel once you’re done.

Writing Exercises To Give Your Creativity A Bit Of A Workout

WritingIf you find yourself lugging heavy boxes around, and realise you’re struggling, you might think “man, I need to hit the gym”. It’s a logical conclusion. Working out over a period of time will make you stronger and better equipped to lug heavy boxes. Makes sense.

Arguably the same is true with your mind. That’s why brain-training exercises are so popular. You either use it or lose it.

Many writers appreciate writing exercises for the same reason. Often I find it helps, if I’m stuck on a particular writing puzzle, to walk away from writing all together. I’ve read that walking is a physical exercise that operates at the same pace as thinking. So if, say, I’ve got an awkward plot-point to work through, a nice walk away from the computer through the countryside means I come back to it later and – bang – the ideas are flowing, even if I haven’t been mulling the problems over. Actually, not thinking about my problems helps me solve them. Does that work for you?

Regardless, there’s a school or thought that says just like how cardio-vascular training improves your general fitness, writing exercises improve your ability to write your own projects. Do them regularly, and you won’t run into as many story problems, or if you do run into them, you’ll be better at solving them.

I don’t know if that’s really true or not, and I’ll be honest, I don’t do writing exercises – or “prompts” – at all. But if it’s something you think might help you, there are lots of sites that offer you interesting, challenging and fun creative writing exercises. These ones from writers digest look particularly good.

Why not give them a go? Creative writing prompts. Little exercises to get the creative juices flowing, and who knows, maybe springboard you into a whole new project!

Become A Selfish Writer

notepadI’ll keep this short. Often, if you’re a copywriter or something like that, you’ll be producing “content” that you’ve been hired to do. It won’t be something you’d chose on your own. You don’t have the luxury of being picky.

But if you’re writing your first novel, chances are no one has commissioned you to write it. It’ll be something you do on spec, either to self-publish or to send out to literary agents and publishers.

And with that being the case, I can only recommend one thing that might make the task more achievable: Write what you want to read.

That’s it really. Just become a selfish writer. Write the kind of story you would want to flick through in a bookstore. Could you imagine yourself coming across it in a recommendation from Amazon? What would the back blurb say? Would you be interested? Even if you’d never bought anything from the author before?

It’s an imprecise measurement for sure, but it’s probably the nearest thing we have when we’re starting out on a writing project to an “acid test” for our work. If you can genuinely imagine yourself being interested in your work, then you’ve got a much better chance of it resonating with others too. We’re all different in our tastes, but not so different that we’d hate every single thing that other people like. If you like it, chances are other people will do. It might be a few dozen people, several thousand people, or even millions. That part is down to the luck of the draw.

But if you can write something you really care about, something that selfishly you’d love to read yourself, then it will have a vibrancy and authenticity to it. It’ll be credible. Your enthusiasm and care will burn onto the page, you won’t be able to help it.

In short, writing what you want to read is the best way to guarantee your work will be the best version of itself.

Rewrite Until Your Work Has Clarity

Keys on a keyboardI’ve written previously how as a novelist I strive to write until my work no longer looks like ‘writing’, that is to say “writing in such a way that nothing gets in the way of understanding what I’m trying to communicate”. But as some have written and told me, that’s really easier said than done. And they’re absolutely right. Writing often sophisticated ideas and concepts in a way that’s simple and clear for even a cursory glance, is, as one emailer from Newfoundland so perfectly put it, wicked difficult.

And in a way it’s unfair to a writer. You spend all your time writing and rewriting your masterpiece, getting it just right, only to the reader to pick it up and devour it in a simple and straightforward way. Without effort.

I liken the process to being a video editor. If there’s even one frame of video in an edit that shouldn’t be there, if you cut one frame too soon (or one frame to late), it sticks out like a sore thumb. Everyone will notice it, and it’ll be distracting. You will have done a bad job as a video editor. But if you really work at it, and craft the edit to perfection, no one notices the edit itself. You essentially disguise the craft. It’ll be a film so perfectly edited, that no one even thinks of the work as “being edited”. That’s a good thing, but it’s a real shame for the editor who spent so much time and effort in the cutting room floor in the first place. There’s every chance they won’t be recognised for their work.

Of course there’s lots of different ways to approach the style of a book. But writing in a straightforward and clear way is generally the sweet-spot for contemporary popular fiction.

And despite it being difficult, simplification is the key to success if you’re writing this way. Keep going back until your points can be understood with a simple cursory glance. If readers really have to study your words, they simply won’t read it properly. They might miss your point and get lost later on. They might even get bored and turn to something else. Disaster.

You need to have a style, sure. But next time you’re starting a new writing project, why not try to let that style come up subtly, through the ideas and stories you’re communicating. Try to avoid, as Elmore Leonard once put it, “the author sticking his nose in”. This might help give you a simplicity, and reduces the barrier between writer and reader.

I’m blown away by the positive responses I’m getting on my latest book, Succession of Power. My goal was for it to be read quickly (the story moves at a fast pace), and it took a lot of work for the narration to move with clarity and simplicity. A few of the reviews and personal emails I’ve had have pointed out how much they enjoy the pace.

I’m touched by that of course, but even more pleased with what that compliment really means. They felt it was pacy, because it was so easy to read. That’s the magic.

I only hope my next big project – whatever that may be – will live up to that standard.

The best of luck to you and your writing, however you’re getting stuck in with it.

UK General Election 2017: Brexit

No10It’s being said on every channel and media network that we’ll now get a “softer” Brexit. Theresa May took a gamble, to increase her majority and failed. That means the people have told her they don’t want her type of “extreme Tory Brexit” as described by Nicola Sturgeon and the like.

The problem is, the numbers don’t appear to support that.

As I write this, there’s a delay on the vote count for Kensington and Chelsea. But either way it’s going to be either a Labour or Conservative seat. That means it’s another MP elected by a party that explicitly campaigned on a promise to deliver Brexit. You could argue that the Tories wanted a “harder” (cleaner?) Brexit, and the Labour Party, sort of, well, I guess they didn’t really spell it out did they? Which was clever, with hindsight, making them all things to all people. Either way, it’s another MP in the Brexit column.

If you add up the number of MPs elected from parties who are essentially still pro-remain (and by that I use the generous version of remain to mean those who accept Brexit will happen, but want it to be so light as to be insignificant), and assuming that the one independent/other elected who I’ll just assume is a remainer because I don’t know, you end up with 60. That number might be filled with some who personally really support Brexit, but I’m just going on the basis of party line rather than what happens to be in each individual’s heart.

Now add up the parties who were overtly pro-leave. That’s Labour, Conservative and the DUP. 590 MPs. Again, some of those individual MPs were opposed to leave, and vocally so. But they are a minority in every case, and their parties were clear.

So ten times as many MPs were elected on a party platform to support Brexit than not.

We may very well get a less clean Brexit as a result of this election. In fact, that’s likely. And I’m not suggesting that this is either right or wrong. It’s just interesting to see what the numbers – so far – appear to be telling us.