This is from Daniel Hannan’s superb blog on the Daily Telegraph website, just look at these graphs:
And this one too:
Any way you choose to look at it, the Commonwealth’s growth is about to exceed that of the European Union/Eurozone. Again, I’m all for open free trade with our European neighbours, but by cutting ourselves off from free trade elsewhere, haven’t we shackled ourselves to a corpse? And how is having a trade agreement with one group of countries at the explicit expense of others free trade? That’s just protectionism…
My local MP John Redwood has, in four basic points, eviscerated the myth that laissez-faire light touch regulation (or the so-called “Anglo-Saxon Approach”) was responsible for the banking crisis:
1. The European banking system is in a worse mess than the UK or US systems today. There is no evidence that the EU, Spaniards, Italians, Greeks and Germans suddenly fell in love with “light touch Anglos Saxon regulation” and made the same mistake, yet they ended up with more weak banks.
2. The volume of regulations expanded substantialy during the build up of the boom. The EU came into the game and added many pages of new financial regulation at their level, on top of all the extra regulations the UK and US authorities were issuing. The UK was governed by a left of centre administration which believed in the efficacy of more regulation. The FSA reviewed all past banking regulation and added to it.
3. The authorities themselves were enthusiastic proponents of the easier credit they allowed under their myriad of new detailed regulations. In the US a Democrat President promoted more mortgages to people on low incomes as a social policy, which led directly to the junk loans which jeopardised the system later. They called the crisis the “sub prime” crisis in honour of the loans advanced by mortgage banks and by a couple of state financing arms that were fully nationalised in the crisis. The UK government ran up big bills paid for by off balance sheet transactions called PFI and PPP in the spirit of the lend more age.
4. The UK administration was particularly keen on promoting the growth of Northern Rock, a North Eastern company, and RBS,a Scottish company, as they grew very quickly. They took pride in the huge expansions of their balance sheets, and in the way they used off balance sheet vehicles to speed their growth. In the good days these were northern and Scottish companies showing London and the south how to run modern banking and financial services.
I wonder if we’ll ever be able to put this myth that laissez-faire is to blame to bed for good? Sadly, I doubt it…